What is the fastest/user friendliest way to participate in FidoNet
nowadays?
Is downloading QWK packages still the way to go?
Any other more practical methods you use?
Hi all,
It's been a very long time away from the BBS scene. What is the fastest/user friendliest way to participate in FidoNet nowadays? Is downloading QWK packages still the way to go? Any other more practical methods you use?
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
* Origin: 4d2 dot org // bbs.4d2.org // +1 541 442 4422 (1:105/45)
Maurice Kinal wrote to Cem Uzunoglu <=-
I used MultiMail with nvim editor on the linux terminal.
The main thing here is I don't know if there is a way to sync my
down/reply packets without going through the login process of a BBS.
* Origin: 4d2 dot org // bbs.4d2.org // +1 541 442 4422 (1:105/45)
I am guessing whatever way you posted the above question.I used MultiMail with nvim editor on the linux terminal.
I sure hope not ... QWK sucks ... always has.The main thing here is I don't know if there is a way to sync my down/reply packets without going through the login process of a BBS.
Hey August!
Just keep in mind that more than 12 penguins is not compatible with
quoting. ;)
Yep. The below 100% legitimate penguin matrix fits perfectly in a msg
but will indeed screw up any attempt to properly quote back given the additional characters added by any quote method currently being deployed by fidonet msg-ing types. What a shame.
-o o- o- o- -o o- -o -o -o o- o- o-
(\ /) /) /) (\ /) (\ (\ (\ /) /) /)
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
12. Those "fit" OK.
Twice over now. I see it could easily go thrice.
o- o- -o -o -o -o o- o- -o -o -o -o -o o- o-
o- /) /) (\ (\ (\ (\ /) /) (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ /)
/) /) ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... Fidonet 4K - Sweet Sixteen Penguins of the Apocalypse. -+- GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
+ Origin: One of us @ (1:153/7001.2989)
I still think QWK or offline mail is the way to go.
I used MultiMail with nvim editor on the linux terminal.
Thrice seems ok here.
Maybe you can consider bringing in your penguins closer to each
other
Mike Powell wrote to CEM UZUNOGLU <=-
MK> I am guessing whatever way you posted the above question.
I used MultiMail with nvim editor on the linux terminal.
MK> I sure hope not ... QWK sucks ... always has.
The main thing here is I don't know if there is a way to sync my down/reply packets without going through the login process of a BBS.
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
Looks like you are on a Synchronet BBS. You can log into the BBS to up/download packets but, if your sysop allows ftp access, you can also
set up ftp scripts to up/download your packets.
Excellent choice. nvim should have no issues with utf-8
but I can't say the same for either QWK or Bluewave
honouring utf-8 characters. I honestly believe a new
offline format is required.
Yes, if you're not interested in network emails, NNTP is fine and
simple.
No one seems to be interested in building a new offline packet
system.
Hey Alan!
I still think QWK or offline mail is the way to go.
I agree with offline mail but definetly *NOT* QWK ... or bluewave while we're at it. However given the lack of suitable client/server applications I can readily understand the attraction of multimail QWK / Synchronet ftp setup.
Personally I think the idea requires a total overhaul.
I generally use BW with BBBS
There was a time when FTN was the place to be but that is long gone
now, unfortunately.
There was a time when FTN was the place to be but that is long gone
now, unfortunately.
As far as I am personally concerned, I plan to continue, which probably makes me best-er. :-)
I don't have a programmer or developer bone in my body so I can't
share any of that.
| Sysop: | Merlin |
|---|---|
| Location: | West Virginia |
| Users: | 9 |
| Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 494197:04:48 |
| Calls: | 95 |
| Files: | 5,002 |
| D/L today: |
4,194 files (1,954M bytes) |
| Messages: | 23,350 |