Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44
Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not weird really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it happens a lot.
Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more meaningful to the user.
Re: Message Base Question
By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 17:07:44
Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan basedon
their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedlywritten
(which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, notweird
really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, ithappens a
lot.
Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?), makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written date, which is more meaningful to the user.
Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?),
makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written
date, which is more meaningful to the user.
| Sysop: | Merlin |
|---|---|
| Location: | West Virginia |
| Users: | 9 |
| Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 494196:55:08 |
| Calls: | 95 |
| Files: | 5,002 |
| D/L today: |
3,693 files (1,661M bytes) |
| Messages: | 23,350 |